« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: About 'Gun Control' "laws" . . .

By: zzstar in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 17 Feb 18 2:00 AM | 43 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 00814 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 00811 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I do.

Muskets and powder.

If the government ever took over, no chickenhawk would ever have a chance. Three days and they'd all be DEAD.

We’re way past that age.

Give that 2nd Amendment bullshit a REST.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: About 'Gun Control' "laws" . . .
By: Zimbler0
in BAF
Sat, 17 Feb 18 1:24 AM
Msg. 00811 of 06530

ZZ,
Have you any idea why the Second Amendment was written
into the Constitution?

I really don't think so.

The Founding Fathers knew full well that if the population
were disarmed, 'We The People' would be ripe for a 'hostile
takeover'. With a well armed populace 'We The People'
could quickly form into militias and drive out any
invading hostile forces.

They were also smart enough to realize that hostile
foreign entities were not the only threat to our
existence. There are also those who would subjugate
our government entities and enslave the American Peoples
to a tyranny of government.

So, riddle me this.
If the Chinese Army were to invade North America, should
'We The People' be armed with muskets and flintlocks?
Or should we be armed with semi-automatic weapons.

Or this.
Trayvon Martin was a seventeen year old six foot tall
thug who was trying to murder George Zimmerman. By
cracking his skull open on a concrete sidewalk. Should
murderous thugs like Trayvon have a 'right' to kill
people . . . Or should 'We The People' have a right
to defend ourselves?

The Second Amendment is not an 'historical relic'.

Zim.


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next