What do you mean by freedom? The absence of restriction?
There's something called anarchy, but that has never worked well.
The indigenous peoples lacked laws, and the restrictions created by, property rights. But that's more of a community-based system. Primitive or natural communism.
The reason for the vast bulk of non-criminal law is because folks have to manage the competing interests generated by private property.
The whole private property based economy is a system of restriction. You claim a duty from me that I won't take the thing you possess.
Takes a lot of law to make such a thing work.
My main contention is that you should admit your own system's costs.