« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: csl will like this one 

By: xcslewis in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 15 Nov 17 1:36 AM | 53 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 23247 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 23245 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I have no idea whether or not the alleged events occurred or not. Like most people, I am not comfortable with the idea of a man in his early 30's pursuing younger girls, but I come from a different place.

However, in Moore's defense;and I am reluctant to present the defense.

Moore was from a dirt poor family and perhaps not at the top of the list for many prospective girls when he was first at "dating age". He managed to extricate himself from his circumstances.

He attended West Point and graduated. West Point was not exactly an environment to find a prospective spouse.

He then served in the Army for five years.

Upon leaving the Army he spent three years in law school.

He may or may not have dated women over that 12 year time frame. I have not seen any information in the press relating to his dating activity that covered that period. The reality is by the time he was done with law school most women his age were likely married, or had had, or were in relationships.

Moore is a fundamentalist Christian. Many men, especially Southern men with his belief system, want to marry a virgin. I don't know if that applies in his case but it is plausible.

If that was the case he may have concluded the most likely route to find a suitable spouse, in his view, was to pursue younger women. He did in fact marry a much younger women when he was 38 years old.

The allegations include only one women that was not of age of consent. Her history may indicate a lack of credibility, but in any event, cannot be refuted or proved.

There is a second possible infraction of providing alcohol to minors. Moore has denied that and presented a defense to support his denial, that the county in which the incident is said to have occurred was a dry county.

All the "evidence" presented is circumstantial or hearsay, unverifiable and four decades old.

The publication that pursued the story has a definite agenda and is in opposition of conservatives, Republicans, Trump and Moore. It appears to me to be dishonest and sham journalism.

The Republican establishment is also anti Moore.

Obviously the Democratic party has the same view.

Everyone deserves the presumption of innocence.

It is for the people of Alabama to decide the election, not the national news media nor the corrupt self serving national political parties.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
csl will like this one
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Tue, 14 Nov 17 4:05 PM
Msg. 23245 of 54959

"He said he did not have proof, but speculated about coordination between the Post and the GOP. “The enemy of the enemy is my friend. They both want Judge Moore to lose, so they’re happy to work together,” he said.

It seemed as if Breitbart’s coverage of Mondays's accusations by Beverly Young Nelson, who accused Moore of sexually assaulting her when she was 16, might have represented a turning point. The site’s headline even pointed out that Nelson was a Trump supporter, blaring: “Alabama woman says Roy Moore sexually assaulted her in 1997…’I thought he was going to rape me’…Gloria Allred: Trump supporter came to me.”

But asked if he believed Nelson, Marlow replied, “Not necessarily,” and focused on attorney Allred’s presence as a discrediting source.

“She came off as sincere today, but it is the sort of thing where the words were chosen so perfectly and she’s got Gloria Allred right next to her,” he said.

Marlow said that, if the stories of Nelson and Leigh Corfman, who also alleged sexual assault, “are true and Roy Moore really was a predator, particularly against children,” then “he should not be a United States senator.”

The accounts of the women who have come forward so far, though, were not enough to convince him. So what would be?

“I don’t know the answer to that. Look, I’m not Mr. Opinion guy,” he said. “I think people will know when they’ve seen enough.”"

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/13/breitbart-roy-moore-republicans-244870

But perhaps it was Breitbart wot changed csl.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next