Replies to Msg. #1020985
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
38420 Re: SPLC
   Thanks, De, very sensible. There seems to be no recourse against such...
starlight   POPE IV   12 Nov 2017
9:51 AM
38381 Re: SPLC
   ...holding the splc to the same laws as the rest of us would doubtless...
ribit   POPE IV   11 Nov 2017
10:58 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: SPLC

By: Decomposed in POPE IV
Sat, 11 Nov 17 6:25 PM
Msg. 38367 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 38346 by starlight)
Jump to msg. #  

starlight: 

re: "SPLC came out and said they intend to "destroy" the organizations and people on their hate list. Isn't that illegal? Can't they be put out of business, given that declaration?"

I doubt it.

If "destroy" means "kill," then it's a death threat and is illegal. But is that what SPLC meant and can a prosecutor prove it?

I don't think so. You can't kill an organization, so that's obviously not what SPLC meant. SPLC can argue that since it doesn't mean kill in THAT context, it doesn't mean kill with regard to people either.

In their defense, what they'll argue is that it's not illegal to say they intend to "destroy" a politician. It only means "ruin," and that's not illegal. 




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months