Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: We need MORE women in power! 

By: Decomposed in BAF | Recommend this post (4)
Wed, 19 Jul 17 9:21 PM | 64 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 00007 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 00006 by Beldin)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Beldin: 

re: "clo's very own words condemn her as being one of Lewis' would-be "omnipotent moral busybodies" ... "women will work together for the good of the whole." She ignorantly believes that this world needs more imperious, overweening nannies to tell everyone else what they can and can't do, say, and think. Nothing ... NOTHING! ... could be further from the truth."

I wish it stopped there. clo says: 

Uploaded Image

"We need MORE women in power!"
 
Uploaded Image

- and doesn't understand why the thought is so repugnant.

Suppose I said that we need more MEN in power? Oh, she'd rail against such a sexist remark. (But there's no sexism in calling for more women?) What if I said we need more HETEROSEXUALS in power? She'd call me a homophobe! How about, we need more EUROPEANS? More whites? More blonde-haired, blue eyed citizens? I'd be branded a racist, and rightfully so.

I don't say those things.

Supporting people because of WHAT they are instead of WHO they are is anti-individualistic, anti-American and EVIL. I may come down hard on Muslims, homosexuals, criminals, losers, floozies, liberals, but these are all things people CHOOSE to be, not engravings in stone over which people have no say.

clo is the opposite. She labels and brands people by their genes, their heritage, their color. She's a despicable, vile human being who really has nothing in common with what Americans are meant to be: A sovereign people, with equal rights in the eyes of the government and with ample (but not equal... nothing can make people equal) opportunity to succeed.
 




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: We need MORE women in power!
By: Beldin in BAF
Wed, 19 Jul 17 8:50 PM 		Msg. 00006 of 06530

Yeah, I saw this ridiculous post of hers over on the Further Freedom From Thought Board, as well.

In general, women do not make for good leaders ... or voters, for that matter ... because the vast majority of them emote, rather than think. That's not a slam against women ... it's just their nature. Some women can overcome their gender's innate tendency towards emotion over rationality and become solid leaders, but they are a minority. Therefore, if you truly want classic liberalism to thrive, you will recognize and advocate for LESS women with political power.

I know I bring this up a lot, but C.S. Lewis said, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

clo's very own words condemn her as being one of Lewis' would-be "omnipotent moral busybodies" ... "women will work together for the good of the whole." She ignorantly believes that this world needs more imperious, overweening nannies to tell everyone else what they can and can't do, say, and think. Nothing ... NOTHING! ... could be further from the truth.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next