Yeah, I saw this ridiculous post of hers over on the Further Freedom From Thought Board, as well.
In general, women do not make for good leaders ... or voters, for that matter ... because the vast majority of them emote, rather than think. That's not a slam against women ... it's just their nature. Some women can overcome their gender's innate tendency towards emotion over rationality and become solid leaders, but they are a minority. Therefore, if you truly want classic liberalism to thrive, you will recognize and advocate for LESS women with political power.
I know I bring this up a lot, but C.S. Lewis said, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
clo's very own words condemn her as being one of Lewis' would-be "omnipotent moral busybodies" ... "women will work together for the good of the whole." She ignorantly believes that this world needs more imperious, overweening nannies to tell everyone else what they can and can't do, say, and think. Nothing ... NOTHING! ... could be further from the truth.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
