Replies to Msg. #1005664
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
28951 Re: he US had a clear shot at killing Kim Jong Un on July 4 - here's why it didn't strike
   Thanks for pointing it out Professor! I thought that but did not wa...
micro   POPE IV   12 Jul 2017
1:01 AM
28949 and BTW ... Re: he US had a clear shot at killing Kim Jong Un on July 4 - here's why it didn't strike
   Oh, and btw - if the trajectory of the missile had been verified as a...
monkeytrots   POPE IV   12 Jul 2017
12:57 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: he US had a clear shot at killing Kim Jong Un on July 4 - here's why it didn't strike

By: monkeytrots in POPE IV
Wed, 12 Jul 17 12:51 AM
Msg. 28948 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 28947 by Decomposed)
Jump to msg. #  

Yahoo.com missed the mark on 'Why it didn't strike.'

It is because we now have a man as President who actually respects the Constitution.

Assassinating a 'foreign leader' of an admittedly very hostile to the US foreign nation, when said foreign nation is NOT AT WAR with the US, and said foreign nation has NOT ATTACKED THE UNITED STATES, would not only be an Act of War illegally initiated by the President of the United States, UNConstitutionally, and in violatioon of both United States Law and 'international' TREATIES that the United States has legally ratified.

and THAT, folks, is the REAL REASON why we did not strike.

We have a President who actually respects the law.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...