Senator John Fetterman had a medical incident causing a fall, and it required medical treatment.
U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) ~Statement from Sen. Fetterman’s Spokesperson:
“During an early morning walk, Senator Fetterman sustained a fall near his home in Braddock.
Out of an abundance of caution, he was transported to a hospital in Pittsburgh.
Upon evaluation, it was established he had a ventricular fibrillation flare-up that led to Senator Fetterman feeling light-headed, falling to the ground and hitting his face with minor injuries.
Senator Fetterman had this to say: ‘If you thought my face looked bad before, wait until you see it now!’
He is doing well and receiving routine observation at the hospital. He has opted to stay so doctors can fine-tune his medication regimen.
Senator Fetterman is grateful for the EMTs, doctors, and nurses who are providing his care.”
The Left is having a real normal one, per usual. One would think Democrats could be normal in the wake of a medical emergency. One would be wrong.
Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) ~Blue Sky is an absolute cesspool right now in the wake of the news about John Fetterman's fall.
Scott G (@SkidWillie) ~Blue Sky is a hate site.
Mr. Conte (@Suspensionboss) ~Liberals are such a hateful bunch of people.
Nicole Silverio (@NicoleMSilverio) ~This is so evil and godless.
That sums up the Democrats.
The Pure Pop Pub (@IconicMidW) ~Blue Sky, which only exists because X was supposedly "too crass," has always been a cesspool.
All the nastiest people migrated there.
The Galaxy's Shortest Wookie (@Crapplefratz) ~Compare that with what Conservatives are posting on "toxic" X right now:
Because the Right is not insane.
Ladylawyer ( @Ladylaw31256058 ) ~Party is irrelevant! I wish you a speedy recovery Senator. 🙏 🤲
There was one other question being considered, as well. One that I know was on the mind of the frog king.
RBe (@RBPundit) ~Glad he's okay.
RELATED: Does anyone know if Hillary Clinton was anywhere in the vicinity of Braddock, PA today in the early morning?
Fair question.
It's good news to hear Senator Fetterman is resting and receiving good care. This sounds as if it could have been way more serious. Prayers up for his full recovery.
Meanwhile, preventative measures have been taken to keep Fetterman safe ...
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
...that's my "Fake Missing the Punch Spinning Back Kick" if the camera guy had not turned it off so quick ya woulda seen that boxing bag holder kicked into low earth orbit.
Msg. 13903 of 13905 (This msg. is a reply to
13899 by
Beldin)
Jump:
...that's my "Fake Missing the Punch Spinning Back Kick" if the camera guy had not turned it off so quick ya woulda seen that boxing bag holder kicked into low earth orbit.
Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!
On Wednesday the House Oversight Committee Democrats released some Epstein-related emails intended for media consumption (and of course the MSM ate it up without question). One of those emails contained a name that was redacted that hadn't been previously blacked out. The reason? Well, it would have ruined the intended narrative:
Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) ~Why did Democrats cover up the name when the Estate didn't redact it in the redacted documents provided to the committee?
It's because this victim, Virginia Giuffre, publicly said that she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump.
Democrats are trying to create a fake narrative to slander President Trump.
Shame on them. Oversight Dems (@OversightDems) ~ 🚨 BREAKING: Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
Read them for yourself. It’s time to end this cover-up and RELEASE THE FILES.
And look at what these sleazy, lying, Democrat sacks-o-sh!t write at the end - "RELEASE THE FILES." Well, again ... guess what happened next.
But all that from the Dems was enough to start a new round of "release the Epstein files" from the Dems and others:
Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) ~Trump and complicit Republicans are engaged in a massive cover up of the Epstein Files.
Release. The. Epstein. Files.
"Release the Epstein files"?
Rep. Tim Burchett tried that very thing on the same night the House voted to end the Schumer shutdown (which President Trump will sign soon), but his unanimous consent vote request was shot down:
Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) ~ 🚨 BREAKING: THERE IT IS! Democrats BLOCK Rep. Tim Burchett's motion to bring the Epstein Files to an immediate House floor vote.
Can you imagine that? They don't care.
"I just made a motion to bring it straight to the dadgum floor and they blocked it. They blocked it!"
The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) ~Please note: Democrats just blocked an effort to bring the Epstein Files to an immediate House floor vote. Gosh, why would they do that?
Gee, it's almost like this is a big political game for the Dems for distraction purposes.
This whole Epstein files nonsense is just a political game for the Democrats. In the end, the Democrats probably don't want all of the files fully released because they will more than likely condemn some high-profile Democrats.
Trump says America needs H-1B workers to teach Americans to become qualified workers. He says don’t have talented people here. Says we need H-1B to teach Americans how to be engineers.
Per the Economic policy institute , 60 percent of H1-B workers in the U.S. are entry level. So a majority work in entry level or junior positions.
I wonder who has Trumps ear. A few years ago Trump called H1-B a scam that suppressed wages for American Engineers.
I think Trump is thinking of the O-1 visa for those with extraordinary skills not found here?
You'd think, after dropping such a huge 'Epstein bombshell,' that Democrats would be front and center to vote yes when Tim Burchett tried to release all of the Epstein files yesterday. And yet, that's not what happened.
In fact, they blocked his efforts, almost as if they were exploiting a poor, dead woman to smear the president so they could deflect from the embarrassing loss they took when they realized the government would be opening.
And then, for whatever reason, Adam Kinzinger accused Burchett of lying.
Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) (@AdamKinzinger) ~This isn’t true. It’s performance. He knows it and is assuming ignorance
No matter how many southern “gigglity goos” you do doesn’t change the fact.
Notice that crybaby Kinzinger doesn't bring any facts to his accusation, which is sadly all too common with Liz Cheney's number-one fanboy.
Burchett was good enough to respond (and was far kinder than we would have been to him):
Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (@RepTimBurchett) ~Hey Adam, great to hear from you. Perhaps you would still be in Congress if you better understood the rules. The Parliamentarian confirmed that Democrat leadership and Republican leadership both had to agree to the UC. Speaker Johnson agreed to it, Leader Jeffries did not, which is why it was ruled out of order. Please visit page 805 of the House Manual for further clarification. Hope this clears things up! http://govinfo.gov/app/collection/HMAN
Aww, look at Burchett, always the kind giver, even if it's whiny, crybaby Kinzinger who needs to be "informed." And Burchett brings up a good point, it's been a while since Democrats gerrymandered his office out of existence, maybe he forgot how these things work.
Ahem.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
Like the majority of Americans, Bill O'Reilly is less than impressed with Democrats' efforts to smear and hurt President Trump with their selective release of redacted documents that only ultimately make them look worse. If they were truly concerned about justice, they would have supported Tim Burchett's efforts on the House floor to release ALL of the documents.
Gosh, golly, gee ... they didn't want to do that.
We wonder why.
Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) ~Bill O’Reilly sums up the Democrats’ Epstein strategy to smear Donald Trump with 3 devastating words.
Once Stephen A. Smith heard this, he was in full agreement, calling O’Reilly’s point “incredibly important.”
O’REILLY: “What we see today is a bunch of innuendo. It’s hearsay. There isn’t any direct backup for any allegation because there aren’t any allegations other than Trump may have been in a house where there were some girls.
“Okay, so you have the lady in question. And I feel very bad for Ms. Giuffre’s family. She committed suicide...You have her saying under oath, Trump didn’t do anything.
“And you have Maxwell, but here’s the most important person you have — not under oath: Dershowitz. Dershowitz was Epstein’s lawyer, and lawyer–client confidentiality ends with death.
“Dershowitz went on television today, said, I have all of the Epstein stuff, and there isn’t anything. And I asked Epstein directly while I was representing him whether Donald Trump was involved in any kind of untoward activity. And Epstein said no.
“So now you have the three principal players in this case (Dershowitz, Maxwell, Giuffree) all saying the same thing, yet the press is so irresponsible, so corrupt, so hateful, they will not even mention that.
“It’s DEATH BY INUENDO. That is what they are aiming for.”
CUOMO: “Stephen A., what do you think?”
SMITH: “I get that. And I think that what Bill said and just articulated is incredibly important. It is death by innuendo.” Video ~http://x.com/i/status/1988811148716544010
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
On Wednesday the House Oversight Committee Democrats released some Epstein-related emails intended for media consumption (and of course the MSM ate it up without question). One of those emails contained a name that was redacted that hadn't been previously blacked out. The reason? Well, it would have ruined the intended narrative:
Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) ~Why did Democrats cover up the name when the Estate didn't redact it in the redacted documents provided to the committee?
It's because this victim, Virginia Giuffre, publicly said that she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump.
Democrats are trying to create a fake narrative to slander President Trump.
Shame on them. Oversight Dems (@OversightDems) ~ 🚨 BREAKING: Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
Read them for yourself. It’s time to end this cover-up and RELEASE THE FILES.
And look at what these sleazy, lying, Democrat sacks-o-sh!t write at the end - "RELEASE THE FILES." Well, again ... guess what happened next.
But all that from the Dems was enough to start a new round of "release the Epstein files" from the Dems and others:
Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) ~Trump and complicit Republicans are engaged in a massive cover up of the Epstein Files.
Release. The. Epstein. Files.
"Release the Epstein files"?
Rep. Tim Burchett tried that very thing on the same night the House voted to end the Schumer shutdown (which President Trump will sign soon), but his unanimous consent vote request was shot down:
Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) ~ 🚨 BREAKING: THERE IT IS! Democrats BLOCK Rep. Tim Burchett's motion to bring the Epstein Files to an immediate House floor vote.
Can you imagine that? They don't care.
"I just made a motion to bring it straight to the dadgum floor and they blocked it. They blocked it!"
The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) ~Please note: Democrats just blocked an effort to bring the Epstein Files to an immediate House floor vote. Gosh, why would they do that?
Gee, it's almost like this is a big political game for the Dems for distraction purposes.
This whole Epstein files nonsense is just a political game for the Democrats. In the end, the Democrats probably don't want all of the files fully released because they will more than likely condemn some high-profile Democrats.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
What sort of low-life thinks it's appropriate to not only exploit an Epstein victim who took her own life, but to make disgusting and depraved comments about Trump and "underage girls sitting in his lap" knowing the only underage girl to sit in his lap is his own daughter?
Don't answer that. We already know because that's basically what Democrat Rep. Melanie Stansbury said here. Oh sure, the poor victim who killed herself already cleared Trump, BUT watching him with his own daughter "is proof enough."
MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) ~CNN: It was Virginia Giuffre in those Epstein files. She said Trump didn’t do anything.
Crockett: I won’t take any Republican's word for it. I don’t know why they would redact the name who is deceased.
CNN: But, democrats redacted it.
Crockett: We want to protect victims. Virginia wrote a book. She told her truth.
Yeah, Democrats intentionally redacted her previously unredacted name because they knew Virginia Giuffre had already publicly exonerated Donald Trump from any wrong-doing.
MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) ~This is unbelievable ... listen to this shit.
Dem Rep. Melanie Stansbury:
We don’t even know if the redacted name is Virginia Giuffre ... but even if it is Virginia, and even if she has said Trump didn’t do anything wrong, the American people should believe their eyes: “We’ve all seen the photographs of Donald Trump with underage girls sitting on his lap.”
Is this freak talking about that photo of Trump’s daughter Ivanka sitting on his lap? There is literally no photos like this other than his own daughter.
In other words ... she’s saying Ignore the victim’s own statement clearing Trump. Just trust the photos everyone has supposedly seen that don’t exist. WHAT!? 😂😁🤣🤣 Video ~http://x.com/i/status/1988802058036576650
Hmmm ... one wonders if this nauseatingly filthy c*nt has any problems, whatsoever, with Joe Biden taking showers with his pre-teen/teenage daughter, Ashley, eh? Eat sh!t and choke on it, Ms. Stansbury ... your disingenuous contention is laughably stupid in the extreme. You should do your constituents a big favor and immediately resign.
So, forget that the young woman - whom they are exploiting, even after she took her own life - said Trump was innocent because they've seen pictures of him with his daughter? What now? In case you were wondering just how depraved and evil Democrats really are ... woof.
Then again, this is the same party that elected a man who openly fantasized about murdering Republicans and their children, so this shouldn't be all that surprising - it's just sad.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
Msg. 13892 of 13905 (This msg. is a reply to
13890 by
Beldin)
Jump:
So,
whay do people keep talking about qualifications to office?
All ya need to know how to do there is STEAL money and benefits. The Kennedy's are the greatest family on earth doing that. Biden was trying but he's a mere amateur compared to the Kenndy clan.
Now Slick Willy is another story.
You don't need any qualifications. Someone else will tell ya what to do and when to do it..
Its the democrat way.....Time tested and likely even patented...
- - - - - The above is a reply to the following message:
WATCH - This Ain’t Camelot, It’s CRINGEALOT: Kennedy Heir Clicked "Upload" & We’re ALL Victims
By: Beldin in
GRITZ Thu, 13 Nov 25 6:58 PM
Back in September of this year, Representative Jerry Nadler announced that he would not be seeking reelection, and lo and behold, just a few short weeks after the October "No Kings" protest, a young Kennedy whose only actual notable job was with Vogue Magazine (if you can call that an "actual job") has announced his bid for that seat in Congress. But, good Lord, Dear Readers, the video that came across this writer's desk is ALL the cringe.
johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) ~JFK’s grandson, Jack Schlossberg, announces his big for Congress in New York to replace Jerry Nadler.
According to ABC News, "Schlossberg positioned his run as a response in part to the economic agenda put forth by Republicans and President Donald Trump, including Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which Schlossberg said had led to a 'cost of living crisis' with historic 'cuts to social programs working families rely on. Health care, education, child care."
Now, we mentioned the "No Kings" protests for a specific reason. The Kennedy family has always been referred to as "America's Royal Family." This family is one of the most prominent political dynasties in American history. Immigrating from County Wexford in Ireland, the reign begins in 1884 with Patrick Joseph "P. J." Kennedy who was elected to public office in the Massachusetts state legislature until 1895. At least one Kennedy family member was serving in federal elective office in every year from 1947 until 2011.
Wesley Yang (@wesyang) ~The fate of dynasties.
How the mighty have fallen.
Royal Family inbreeding ...
Dissident Soaps (@DissidentSoaps) ~The Kennedies used to lobotomize trouble-making relatives like this.
Midnight Editor (@asectomidnight) ~America’s class system in one video:
Working people need experience to get a job.
Elites need a last name to get a Congressional district. 🤡 🌎
Drew KoTog (@DKotog) ~Another nepo-baby theater-kid for the Dems to add to their ranks. Their party is a bad episode of Glee without the music.
Camelot called. They want their TikTok back.
Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) ~Yep. In New York he’ll win. Grandpa — the tax cutting, pro-military, pro-merit based president who has the highest approval rating in the history of polling - would be SO proud.
MilnerBear (@modelerr) ~If NYC voters went for Nadler, and now Mamdani, they'll certainly elect the grandson of JFK. Doesn't matter whether he's remotely qualified; real qualifications for elected office are inconsequential to Dems.
We have another Joe Biden sighting, this time in Northern Virginia at an Italian restaurant. Biden did his usual shuffling around while looking lost. But this time something magical happened (more on that in a bit).
But see if you can spot it in this video.
Yeah, that "Everyman Moment" was NOT hard to spot.
Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) ~"Oh my God."
Joe Biden shows up to a restaurant in Northern Virginia to a STUNNED crowd.
Straight out of Tim Conway's "Old Man Shuffle" skit!
bird cheat (@birdcheat) ~That's the guy KJP and others in the administration "couldn't keep up with" behind closed doors? Wow!
Davis Merriman (@DavisMerriman1) ~Yeah, Joe totally could have served through to 2029. 🙄
"Sharp as a tack!"
Snarknado (@ZannSuz) ~Do they not realize every time they trot out the old guy, he looks more & more like he escaped the makeup trailer from "Night of the Living Dead"?
Bryan Beltz (@bbeltz1) ~
This guy reckons (@GuyReckons) ~"What's this place? Is it my birthday? Who are all these people? I need a new diaper. Where's Jill?"
Not everyone was thrilled to see the former president. There was one restaurant goer who summed up the whole Biden visit.
tossit (@TossitRambles) ~
THERE HE IS! Especially at 34 seconds into the video.
Mollie (@Molliedumur) ~The dude in the red hoodie is my favorite part of this video.
Now, that’s hilarious.
We love it when a new meme is delivered into the world.
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
| 
