Replies to Msg. #1033517
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
01403 Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
   Decomposed  
BAF   09 Mar 2018
9:15 PM
01393 Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
   EXACTLY. ZZ I think that you really simply just are having a hard...
micro   BAF   09 Mar 2018
4:42 PM
01390 Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
   What it said is in what I pasted from the decision. Your “right” d...
zzstar   BAF   09 Mar 2018
8:42 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...

By: Zimbler0 in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 8:33 AM
Msg. 01389 of 06523
(This msg. is a reply to 01388 by zzstar)
Jump to msg. #  

>>>
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (200Cool, is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right
>>>


ZZ,
What you posted - re-quoted here - says that the Supreme Court
has ruled that the 2nd Amendment 'Protects an Individuals
right . . .

Which right ?

>>>
protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes,
>>>

It then goes on to say :

>>>
that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
>>>

To try and put that in English, it says that the DC handgun ban
was a violation and the Supreme Court struck it down.

Why you can not understand this . . . .

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.