« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: #4 

By: Zimbler0 in BAF | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 25 Sep 18 4:37 AM | 83 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 02826 of 06523
(This msg. is a reply to 02825 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/24/liz-peek-will-metoo-survive-kavanaugh-court-fight.amp.html

Democrats say unproven accusations of sexual misconduct by Christine Blasey Ford and more recently by Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate, are enough to disqualify him from sitting on the bench. Republicans argue that Ford’s and Ramirez’ unsubstantiated recollections are outweighed by the judge’s exemplary career and record of hiring and promoting women. Some have suggested both women’s accounts are part of a coordinated smear campaign designed to keep Kavanaugh off the bench.

The newly revealed claims by Ms. Ramirez – that at a drunken dorm party Kavanaugh thrust his penis in her face – are refuted by numerous people said to have been there, and further complicated by her admission that she was drunk at the time. The new revelations were reported by the New Yorker, which said “Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening…”

In short, her accusation, like that of Christine Blasey Ford, will likely be believed by opponents of the judge, but may not be provable.

>>>

Article does continue. Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
#4
By: Decomposed
in BAF
Tue, 25 Sep 18 4:14 AM
Msg. 02825 of 06523

Re: "Investigators in Montgomery County confirmed Monday they’re aware of a potential second sexual assault complaint in the county against former Georgetown Prep student and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh."
- clo #msg-1052999  

Number 4? That's not very interesting. Tell us when it gets to number 100 - which I'm sure it will if Democrats need it to.

I've known for decades that there is no shortage of liars among leftists. It's harder to find an honest one than a dishonest one. ALL who seek to "redistribute wealth" are thieves, after all, and wealth redistribution is what motivates most Leftists. There is no honor among thieves. Lying is no big deal for them.

But then, look who I'm saying this to. You can personally attest to the truth of it, can't you?


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next