I suppose you blatantly post such ridiculous lies on the Further Freedom From Thought Board because: (1) you know your lies will inflame your fellow libtards, and (2) you also know that your fellow libtards won't ever know you're feeding them lies, either because they simply don't want to know that they are being lied to or they don't have the intellectual capacity to check.
What Kevin Cramer actually said was, "I said my only preference would be, don't succumb to the pressure to make this some sort of an affirmative action pick. Make sure you pick a good, solid conservative and cement this 5-4 conservative majority that we have, based on a judge's or a lawyer's judicial demeanor or philosophy."
Cramer did NOT say anything about favoring one race over another - period, end of story. He quite clearly said he prefers a nominee that is chosen based on merit, rather than some arbitrary, politically correct methodology that doesn't take the person's actual qualifications into consideration. So, in fact, Cramer's stated preference is for the application of non-racial, merit-based parameters.
OCU, your infantile, completely fabricated scare-mongering is ridiculous on its face. But, then again, your libtard audience at the Further Freedom From Thought Board is too complacently stupid to comprehend that you are lying to them.
| 
