Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Here's a new photo for your thoughtless board, clo ... 

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (2)
Fri, 05 Jan 18 3:05 AM | 236 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 00664 of 06523
(This msg. is a reply to 00663 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Zim

You and I are in total agreement. Go back to the original structure and relationship between states and the Federal government.

The Federal government was to provide for the common defense ( military) and for infrastructure.

The STATES were to be in control of everything else within their borders. Pretty straight forward...

So, yes sir! We are on same page.

I am only saying, if the LIBTARDS in those states want to keep going against federal law enforcement of illegal people here, cut them loose.
They really do not want to be part of this nation. Let them find out the hard way what happens when they no longer get all the federal dollars from the rest of us..

Let them go belly up from fiscal irresponsibility but the rest of us who did not squander our resources should not be bailing out the libtards in those states.

Hopefully the FAULT line will finally break and take most of the state with it when it does....




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Here's a new photo for your thoughtless board, clo ...
By: Zimbler0 in BAF
Thu, 04 Jan 18 5:32 AM 		Msg. 00663 of 06523

Actually,
I'm pretty sure that there should not be much of any
spending by the fed within the States. (At least
not for State purposes - military and I'd say the
Interstate High Way System should federal responsibilities.)

Funds for local police forces?
Absolutely NOT the federals responsibility.

Welfare?
Same answer.

I could go on . . . .

Zim.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next